Nicki Minaj‘s hotel bills, including minibar purchases, became public during a legal dispute over an alleged six-figure debt. The receipts paint a detailed picture of her stays, and they reveal someone with very specific tastes.
24/7 Productions, a company that provided live-event services, submitted hotel invoices from accommodations booked under the name Tori Spaulding. They claim they covered the costs without ever being reimbursed.
The production company worked with Nicki Minaj in 2023 on the iHeartRadio Jingle Ball and promotional events surrounding the “Pink Friday 2” album release. They advanced roughly $250K for her expenses, with $125K categorized as personal charges.
According to court documents, both parties agreed that all expenses would be reimbursed. 24/7 is now seeking repayment of what they say they’re owed.
The most substantial charge came from the Langham in New York, where a luxury suite ran $9,500 per night. From December 6 to December 13, 2023, that seven-night stay totaled $76,000 before incidentals.
Room charges added another $3,980. The itemized list includes private-kitchen dining, room service, parking, cash advances, and minibar purchases that offer a window into daily life at that price point.
The breakdown shows over $2,200 on private kitchen food alone. Other charges included premium water options (Evian at $20, Badoit and Ferrarelle at $8), a Coke for $8, M&Ms at $7, Pringles at $7, and various other items. A fairly standard mix of convenience and indulgence.
The Four Seasons in Fort Lauderdale followed, booked for December 12 to 18, 2023 at $3,800 per night for four nights, totaling $17,176.
There, in-room dining came to over $400. Additional charges included over $130 on private bar beverages and food, over $100 on overnight dining, $70 on breakfast, over $500 on pool food, and $77 at a restaurant.
The company points out that they paid her $600K for the Jingle Ball performances, and her subsequent “Pink Friday 2” tour grossed over $100 million. The disputed bill, in that context, represents a fraction of her earnings from that period.
Nicki has pushed back on the claim entirely, arguing she wasn’t a party to the contract in question and that the suit lacks merit.
★★★
