The case against D4vd involved far more grand jury testimony than previously known, with three panels meeting on seven separate occasions before the singer was arrested in April. This D4vd case has kept people talking about the complexities of the legal system and how these proceedings unfold.
Newly unsealed court information shows that testimony was taken over 18 days, including five days in November, another five in December, and eight in February. A judge has now authorized a limited release of those transcripts. The scope of these investigations reveals just how deep the investigative process can go—something many don’t fully understand until they’re reading about it in cases like this one.
The documents will remain out of public reach, and only the attorneys prosecuting and defending the case will receive access to the testimony.
Although authorities had said grand juries were convened during the months leading up to D4vd’s arrest, the full scope of those proceedings had not been disclosed. Law enforcement sources previously referred to the process as an “investigative grand jury.” The secrecy surrounding these hearings is standard practice, but it also means the public rarely gets the full picture of what happens behind closed doors.
D4vd faces charges in the death of Celeste Rivas, whose body was discovered inside his Tesla last year. The allegations paint a troubling picture that has sparked widespread conversation about accountability and justice.
Prosecutors allege that Rivas was a minor and had threatened to reveal potentially damaging information about an alleged relationship with the musician. They claim he invited her to his home in April 2025, killed her, cut up her body and concealed the remains in bags. These are serious accusations that carry significant legal weight.
The singer has denied the accusations through his plea. He entered a “not guilty” plea and requested an immediate preliminary hearing, setting the stage for what’s sure to be a complex legal battle ahead.
★m★
